Officer conduct

Police officers have been found guilty on several occasions being engaged in unlawful practices such that their conduct with the public fails to meet the ethical requirements of policing. There are so many reasons behind the increasing cases of police brutality only that they are defined within a given context (Weitzer, 305-325.). However, based on the level of understanding the department of policing, the outlined and established consequences for police misconduct are quite minimal. 

The police officers have found themselves in the cases of misconduct with the public. The innocent public takes the step of reporting the police brutality complaints, but it is such unfortunate that either of the cases is investigated. According to the central New Jersey reports out of the police brutality complaints presented 99% of them are never investigated, and there is no substantive reason for the failing to provide the justice. This has only got 1% of cases being convicted. The police at the most sound of changing statements and always turning the public to have initiated the misconduct. The failure of providing the remedy to the police brutality has got them involved in the cases with no fear of being convicted. The public raises the eyebrows such that police departments cannot effectively, fairly and objectively undertake an investigation over an alleged misconduct of their officers which a fact. The police will opt out to remain silent over their fellow workmates instead of getting them convicted from the security force, subjected to fines or imprisonment judgment.

Governance is a very substantive aspect that every institution must hold with the concern and aim of making sure that the operations are confined to some well-established standards. The poorly established standards are what it takes to constitute to the police brutality, and it seems to vary widely from one state to another. At any given point, standards provide the guideline over the mode of conduct that police officers must take when interacting with the public. According to the law, the failure of observing the standards should lead to repercussions. However, the identified reason at this point is that the police department has not provided better standards for the police officers when they are in the line of duty. The police officers do not think of anything that may confine and restrict them instead they get involved in misconduct without the fear of facing any prosecutions. Well, the varying of standards fails to give the police officers understanding over what they should not get involved. The public is even not defined within the standards thus being undermined as well.

Furthermore, the other possible initiating factor towards the police misconduct is the training provided to the police officers. According to the experience that the public goes through with the police officers well provides evidence that the many sections of policing department have failed to provide the adequate training in cases of nonviolent solutions. The police officers do not have the best knowledge of appropriately handling and interacting with the public and the only likely thing for them to think as a last resort is violence. The presence of training over such like matters will have them informed on how to handle different cases without being involved in brutal activities. At times, the police officer will want to show off their superiority, and they only see violence as the best way of intimidating the public. The training should get them to an understanding of how to relate with the public in a friendly and polite manner to make sure that law and order are maintained peacefully.

 

Work cited

Weitzer, Ronald, and Steven A. Tuch. "Race and perceptions of police misconduct." Social Problems 51.3 (2004): 305-325.

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in nursing essay help USA if you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom college papers.