Abstract
Lone wolf terrorism is part of the numerous global issues demanding the
attention of governments
across the globe. Lone wolf technology threatens the safety and
well-being of every individual; therefore, governments have to come up with strategies that can mitigate or offer
preventive solutions to the menace.
This
paper analyzes the events, journals
and any form
of material related to lone wolf terrorism and creates an elaborate
description of the critical aspects of this field. The
study also provides
several recommendations on how governments can increase preparedness for lone wolf
terrorist threats.
Introduction
Terrorism
is one among the leading
global issues that has aroused
the interests of every individual and
government across the globe. Acts of terrorism have become a usually
in the news with numerous radical groups
expanding the scope of their attacks across the globe. These
attacks come at a time where the
boundaries between countries
are permissive to the movement as well as increased channels of communication. The field of terrorism has diversified
with the magnitude and intricacy of the
attacks becoming more intense than before.
Problem Statement
There
has been an increase the number and
magnitude of lone wolf attacks across the globe. People
are finding it easier to use violence
to spread their ideologies
without the least bit of concern about the consequences or
repercussions of their actions.
This proposed paper focuses on the
details of lone wolf terrorism develop an understanding of the causes, motives, implications,
characteristics, and mitigation to map out the current state
of the world in terms of security and safety.
Literature Review
Overview of Lone Wolf Terrorism
Many
people conceptualize
terrorism as attacks orchestrated
and executed by radical groups to spread chaos and
mayhem in the pretext of curing the world or
spreading their beliefs. However, the reports
and recordings of the numerous attacks
on the globe divert from this cliché. Lone wolf terrorism
is a form of terrorism characterized
by the malicious attacks orchestrated and executed by a person in support of a set of beliefs and
ideas or some
group or movement.
Lone wolf terrorist always act alone.
They act outside any command structure and without any form
of assistance with resources (Spaaij,
2012). They refrain from making contact with other people or
sharing their agendas with other people and
always make an effort to accomplish their goals individually.
Causes and Motives of Lone Wolf Terrorism
Even
though the actions
of these individuals are free from the direction
of others, it does not occur in a vacuum. Exposure of these individuals to ideologies justifying terrorism is a key ingredient
in the mix of personal vicarious learning experiences that result in a commitment to terrorism (Caruso & Locatelli, 2014). The analytical distinction
between lone wolf terrorism and group terrorism dynamics is usually puzzling because
the inter-group dynamics influences
the actions of lone wolf terrorists
(Caruso & Locatelli, 2014). The circumstances
and surrounding of an individual
are other causes of lone wolf terrorism. Most of the attacks
of lone wolf terrorism are orchestrated and executed
on the basis of religious, political ideologies (Moskalenko
& McCauley, 2011). Lone wolfs act on a blend of personal and political ideologies that emanate from frustrations with broader political, social or religious grievances.
Strong emotional experiences are more than enough to compel an individual to commit malicious attacks against other people (Moskalenko & McCauley, 2011).
Attacks
of large-scale murder have to
have a motive or any form
of agenda that encourages the individual to go through with the attack. Lone wolf terrorists use violence
as a form of advocacy for their attacks. They orchestrate and
execute attacks with a magnitude capable of drawing the attention
of the public to their ideologies. Other lone wolf terrorists
use the attacks
to spread chaos on the pretext of following
beliefs to satisfy their lust for blood
and mayhem. In most cases, the
lone wolf terrorists
will use the attacks to create a sense of relief from the emotional distress
build up emanating from political, social or religious grievances
(Spaaij, 2012). Lone wolf terrorists
obtain most of the ideas and
ideologies from grouped terrorists. Therefore, it is to state that
a crucial motive for lone wolf
attacks is to gratify group terrorists and
show solidarity in ideology (Spaaij,
2012).
Methods of Lone Wolf Terrorism
Lone
wolf as the name suggests plan
and execute their attacks as individuals free from the directions
and support of others in terms of resources. The lone wolf
terrorists gather other required resources
to orchestrate an attack create a strategic plan for the
attack by prying on the
vulnerabilities of the defenses
and execute the attack on a set
date (Berntzen
& Sandberg, 2014). The technological progress made in the
world avails a diversity of resources, opportunities and targets for
attacks. Lone wolf terrorists can launch attacks on the Cyberspace to cause massive financial
losses or use
weapons such as explosives and guns
to cause massive fatalities and destruction
of infrastructure (McCauley et al., 2013).
Implications of Lone Wolf Terrorism
The
fact that lone
wolf terrorism involves attacks executed by single individuals does not mean that
they are not capable of
unleashing numerous implications.
Lone wolf terrorist act alone therefore, have
to have an open mind to execute attacks
capable of inflicting fear and panic.
There is a diversity of implications
of lone wolf terrorism. First and foremost,
lone wolf terrorism causes the death
of scores of individuals
across the globe (Simon, 2013). Lone wolf terrorist at times use weapons
capable of mass destruction and murder. They
take advantage of the vulnerabilities in the security system to plan attacks where
an attack will cause the largest number
of fatalities. These attacks instill fear
and panic among the citizens of a country (Phillips,
2011). The thought of
a lone wolf terrorist bombing a park on a busy day
or appearing in the street with massive
guns and indiscriminately shooting is more than enough to cause fear
among the people.
Lone
wolf terrorist attacks also have adverse
effects on daily business operations in a state or country.
An analytical analysis on the sociological, economic and psychological characteristics of the behavioral patterns of any individual
including clients and
investors indicates that lone wolf terrorist
attacks have the potential to affect people’s judgment (Caruso &
Locatelli, 2014). The panic created from the occurrence
of an attack is enough to scare potential clients
or investors in a region. People value safety
the most across the globe. They
rarely want to engage in risky ventures
or visit risky places. Lone wolf attacks affect
the preferences of tourists across the globe (Caruso & Locatelli, 2014). People tend to avoid
terrorist hot spots or areas known
for increased violence and crime.
It affects a countries ability to attract foreign investment
that subsequently creates a
stunted growth in the economy (Phillips,
2011).
Demographics of Lone Wolf Terrorism
Studies
indicate that lone wolf terrorist
attacks are still relatively rare; nevertheless,
their frequency and magnitude has increased between in the past few
decades in the US and across the globe. Lone wolf
attacks in the late 1960s constituted a small percentage (1.8%) of the total terrorist attacks. The number
increased from 30 attacks in the 1970s to 70 attacks in the 2000s, a growth of 143% (Simon, 2013). A significant percentage (74%) of terrorist attacks
executed between 2009 and
2015 were carried out by one person of which 10% were lone wolf terrorist
attacks (Spaaij,
2010). Further analysis
of these trends indicates that antigovernment ideologies within a broader were the basis
of motivation for 49% of these attacks. The
individuals considered
themselves as patriots working
for a good cause
(Spaaij, 2010). Ideologies of hate ranging from extremist interpretations of Islam to misogyny were
the basis for
the attacks took the larger
share of the remaining percentage (Spaaij, 2010). A study shows
that the United States was and remains
the primary target of lone wolf
terrorist attacks. Out of the one hundred and ninety-eight of
the lone wolf
terrorist attacks performed between 1968 and 2010
across major Western countries,
57% (113 attacks) occurred in
the United States. The recent trend in lone
wolf terrorism includes increased law enforcement
(LE) and military personnel targeting, vast use firearms to conduct
attacks, radicalization through the
internet and proclamation of individual ideology.
Mitigation and Prevention of Lone Wolf Attacks
Governments
have to come up with strategies that can place lone wolf terrorism in place. Normally, these
attacks are more dangerous because they are difficult to pinpoint in the vast population.
However, preventing these attacks is achievable.
The government should invest more in increasing
the intelligence networks that monitor people activities not just within the nation
but across the globe (Spaaij, 2012). The intelligence assists governments to monitor and identify illegal
activity such as the purchase of weapons
or suspicious communication between individuals. The government should invest in equipment and technology that allows it to identify and respond to threats
like facial recognition technology (Bakker & De Graaf, 2011). The governments can also increase the
training and empowerment programs for law
enforcers to increase their proficiency
in responding and handling lone wolf
terrorism incidents (Bakker & De Graaf, 2011). In instances
where the local
or state authorities
can not deal with lone wolf terrorist attacks,
the government can give the public
power to defend themselves as
the final line
of defense (Bakker
& De Graaf, 2011).
Conclusion
People are gaining the courage to express their ideologies
through violence. Lone wolf
terrorism is a manifestation of this
violence and is becoming a throbbing menace to the society. The
government has an obligation
to deliver the safety, well-being and prosperity of its citizens. Therefore, it has to develop a full understanding of lone wolf terrorism to identify patterns that might help it make
predictions and create safety measures
capable of protecting the citizens.
Spaaij, R. (2012). Understanding lone wolf terrorism: Global
patterns, motivations and prevention. Dordrecht: Springer.
Caruso, R., & Locatelli, A.
(2014). Understanding terrorism: A socio-economic
perspective. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Phillips,
P. (2011). Lone wolf terrorism. Peace
Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 17(1).
Simon,
J. (2013). Lone Wolf
Terrorism: Understanding the Growing Threat. Amherst, New York: Prometheus
Books.
Spaaij,
R. (2010). The enigma of lone wolf terrorism: an assessment. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(9), 854-870.
Moskalenko,
S., & McCauley, C. (2011). The psychology of lone-wolf terrorism.Counselling
Psychology Quarterly, 24(2),
115-126.
Bakker,
E., & De Graaf, B. (2011). Preventing lone wolf terrorism: some CT
approaches addressed. Perspectives
on Terrorism, 5(5-6).
Berntzen,
L., & Sandberg, S. (2014). The collective nature of lone wolf terrorism:
Anders Behring Breivik and the Anti-Islamic social movement.Terrorism and
Political Violence, 26(5),
759-779.
McCauley,
C., Moskalenko, S., & Van Son, B. (2013). Characteristics of lone-wolf
violent offenders: A comparison of assassins and school attackers.Perspectives
on Terrorism, 7(1).
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in graduate paper writing service if you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom research paper writing service.
No comments:
Post a Comment