Writing with Authority Assignment for Mechanical Engineering

The use of the term authority can be applied to imply an assortment of things and is mainly dependent on one's purpose, target audience and the situation that is being addressed. Even on those occasions that we understand the type of authority, we intend to use in a certain writing project, it is imperative that one can determine the strategies that are applicable in gaining the authority. To comprehend the manner in which authority works in different writings, it is important to assess the manner in which it operates in the society (Fraistat, 2015).

 In that case, authority writing implies that the writer can write in a tone that implies to the reader that the writer is a credible source of who can deliver the information being proposed. Through the authority writing, the writer can gain the trust of the reader, making them believe that the information being delivered in the article is correct and reliable. The authority writer should thus be able to deliver reliable and correct information in an authoritative fashion that commands the attention of the reader or audience.

In the mechanical engineering field, it is imperative that one attains all the content that appertains to the course to be able to write with authority. In that case, it is imperative that one undertake a lot of research on the different mechanical engineering subjects to ensure that they again all the relevant information to command the authority when they are writing. The ability to deliver timely and accurate facts is the fundamental components that build authority writing (Whitney, Zuidema & Fredricksen, 2014). The attribute is significant in that an individual who has a track record of writing facts about the different subjects has a higher likelihood of developing authoritative writing than the counterpart who has a record of misinforming the readers on certain mechanical engineering attributes. Interacting with specialists in the field is additionally an important attribute that promotes the ability of an individual to be an authoritative mechanical engineering writer. In this case, the interaction exposes the engineer to the vital facts about the course that increases their grasp of the mechanical engineering attributes that promote their understanding of the subject (Gaipa, 2004). The interaction with specialists in the field has the additional importance of offering the individual exposure to authoritative writing that these experts employ in their writing thus ensuring that they have a foundation for their authority writing.

Writing numerous articles on authority writing additionally makes it possible for the mechanical engineer to gain the authority writing as the proactive that they undertake the quality of their authority writing. Reading numerous articles on a certain mechanical engineering attribute and assessing the most reliable articles additionally offers the engineer with expertise on that particular subject and consequently makes it possible for them to command authority in their writing about the subject (Corbett, 2013). Ensuring that all the articles the mechanical engineer writes include powerful steps that easy to follow additionally enhance the authority writing competencies as they present facts with confidence on the proven attributes.

Sharing the different mechanical engineering concepts and experiences with the readers as often as possible presents an opportunity to utilize their experience and consequently, make it possible for the engineer to gain more knowledge about the subject. Ensuring that the articles written possess adequate leadership attributes and that they do not demonstrate uncertainty and any other form of disclaimer make the readers perceive the individual as the informative leader they are searching. Being receptive to feedback is an additional attribute that makes it possible for the mechanical engineer to possess authority in writing (Whitney, Zuidema & Fredricksen, 2014). Being open top feedback makes it possible for the engineer to have an opportunity to keep learning by developing a network of individuals he can go for advice as well as suggestions to improve their existing knowledge, a vital component that promotes the authority of the engineer.

There is a difference in the manner in which an individual writing for their college courses and their professional setting. In the academic world, most of the content that the student writes are ideas that have not been proven and that they do not exhibit the care that professional exhibits. The writings by a professional are meant to exhibit authority relating to the knowledge of the area of expertise. The writing that the professionals undertake is meant to inform other professionals in the field, and thus, they have to command authority of the issue they are addressing. Student work, on the other hand, is meant to convince their instructors that they have grasped the content of the course, and if they are wrong they will just be corrected (Gaipa, 2004). Professional writing, on the other hand, is meant to inform policy formulation and thus, the writer has to be certain and authoritative as failing to observe the authority can result in significantly bad reputation for them and the organization.

There are the specific strategies that one should employ to gain authority in their writing. These include the fact that the individual needs to undertake thorough research to ensure that the facts they are writing are bases on current and correct attributes. The individual needs to undertake significant consultations with other specialists in the field to ensure that the issues that they are putting across are based on the rights assumptions. Consulting specialists can additionally assist these individuals to learn to write with authority and also phrase their ideas in the right manner. The individual should additionally be willing to take corrections as he will be able to gain additional knowledge from the correction and also possess a following that knows the individual is willing to engage them in a discussion. Following through with one promise serves to ensure that the individual remains true to the followers by maintaining consistency with his work thus upholding the reputation. In this case, readers hate false authority and the moment that the writer fails to uphold the promises he gives to the readers, he loses his authority irrespective of the excellent articles were written (Gaipa, 2004). Thus, it is imperative that an individual offers a means that the readers can reach him for clarifications and corrections.

In knowing that an individual has authority, he/ she is specific with their ideas, they maintain a consistent and cohesive, accurate as well as sincere writing. Additionally, the individual should be one that a reader can access to get clarification and additionally present facts in a manner that the reader can understand and trusts, all elements that an individual lacking authority does not possess (Gaipa, 2004).

References

Corbett, S. J. (2013). Negotiating Pedagogical Authority: The Rhetoric of Writing Center Tutoring Styles and Methods. Rhetoric Review, 32(1), 81-98. doi:10.1080/07350198.2013.739497.

Fraistat, S. (2015). The Authority of Writing in Plato’s Laws. Political Theory, 43(5), 657-677. doi:10.1177/0090591714541876.

Gaipa, M. (2004). Breaking into the Conversation: How Students Can Acquire Authority for Their Writing. Pedagogy, 4(3), 419-437.

Whitney, A. E., Zuidema, L. A., & Fredricksen, J. (2014). Understanding teachers’ writing: authority in talk and texts. Teachers & Teaching, 20(1), 59-73. doi:10.1080/13540602.2013.848515.

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in research paper writing help 24 hours if you need a similar paper you can place your order for essay writing services.